/ Vs AroFlo · receipts, not spin
Karven vs AroFlo.
Where each tool wins.
AroFlo is built for bigger operations — 10+ user crews, asset management, scheduled maintenance, complex commercial work. It's expensive and takes days to set up.
- AroFlo: From $135 / user / mo
- AroFlo model: per-user
- Karven: $59/mo per workspace
§01 / Side by side
The shape of the trade-off.
Karven
$59/mo · per workspaceQuoting tool with all the AU-compliance gear around it. Per-trade calculator with live supplier prices, customer accept link with deposit on Stripe, automations with quiet hours + public-holiday awareness, SWMS + TPAR + RCTI baked in.
AroFlo
From $135 / user / mo · per-userEnterprise field-service management, AU.
§02 / Where Karven wins
What Karven does that AroFlodoesn't.
60-second setup vs days of AroFlo configuration
$49 / mo per workspace vs $135+ per user (a 5-person crew is $675/mo on AroFlo)
Schema-driven JSON templates — new trade is a config change (AroFlo needs custom-field builds)
Customer accept link with deposit on Stripe (AroFlo is internal-ops focused)
AU supplier price ingestion baked in
§03 / Where AroFlo wins
What AroFlodoes that Karven doesn't.
Being honest about scope ranks better long-term than spinning. If any of these matter for your work, run AroFlo, or run Karven alongside.
Asset management + scheduled maintenance for commercial fleets
Complex multi-stage job workflows
Project accounting features for commercial builders
Enterprise SSO + advanced permissioning
§04 / Verdict
“If you run a 10+ user commercial field-service operation, AroFlo. If you're solo or a small crew quoting residential, Karven.”
§05 / Other comparisons
See how Karven stacks against the rest.
/ Decide
Try Karven for 60 seconds.
The live calculator is publicly available. No signup. Run a real quote, see if the maths matches yours, decide from there.